Stop chasing behaviors in the playroom and start understanding what is actually driving them
If you have ever left a play therapy session thinking:
“I saw the behaviors… but I have no idea what’s actually driving them.”
You are not alone.
In fact, this is one of the most common reasons play therapists feel stuck.
You may see:
But if your treatment planning only focuses on stopping the behavior, you may miss the deeper story entirely.
This week on Next Level Play Therapy, Cathi Spooner breaks down one of the most important advanced skills a play therapist can develop:
Case conceptualization.
Because when you understand what is beneath the behavior, everything changes.
One of the biggest traps in play therapy is staying at the behavioral level.
When this happens, clinicians often start asking:
While those questions make sense, they often lead therapists into what Cathi describes as chasing behaviors instead of understanding them.
Without strong case conceptualization:
With strong case conceptualization:
Case conceptualization is your ability to move beyond surface behaviors and ask:
“What is this behavior trying to solve?”
Or even deeper:
“What need is this child trying to get met?”
This is the difference between reacting to behavior and understanding behavior.
In this episode, Cathi walks listeners through a fictional client named Carla—a seven-year-old girl in foster care after chronic neglect related to parental substance abuse and homelessness.
In the playroom:
At first glance, a therapist might label Carla as:
But case conceptualization asks a much better question:
What if these behaviors are adaptive survival strategies?
This is where play therapy becomes more than behavior management.
Instead of seeing Carla’s food hoarding as defiance…
“Has food insecurity taught her that her needs may not consistently be met?”
Instead of seeing clinginess as dependency…
“Does her nervous system need proximity because safety has been unpredictable?”
Instead of seeing withdrawal as oppositional…
“Is shutdown protecting her from overwhelming uncertainty?”
This is the heart of trauma-informed play therapy.
Cathi emphasizes that Carla’s brain is likely not organized around curiosity or exploration.
Instead:
Her brain is organized around survival.
This means her nervous system may be shaped by:
So her behaviors make sense.
They are not random.
They are protective.
Through an attachment lens, Carla may have learned:
This changes everything.
Now, her repeated checking for caregiver presence is not simply “clinginess.”
It may be her attachment system doing exactly what it was designed to do:
Maintain enough connection to survive.
One of the most powerful parts of this episode is Cathi’s reminder that play themes matter.
When Carla separates children and adults in the dollhouse, this may symbolize:
Rather than rushing to interpretation, play therapists can hold these themes as meaningful data.
This is why play therapy is not just “playing with toys.”
It is clinically informed observation rooted in theory.
Cathi makes an important point:
Your case conceptualization will always be influenced by your play therapy model.
For example:
Focuses on relationship, trust, and the child’s internal process
May emphasize belonging, mistaken beliefs, and social context
May prioritize nervous system regulation, felt safety, and developmental disruption
May blend EMDR, IFS, expressive arts, sand tray, and attachment-based frameworks
This matters because your model influences:
For Carla, treatment planning should not start with:
“How do we stop the food hoarding?”
Instead:
“How do we help her internalize that her needs will consistently be met?”
Not:
“How do we make her sleep alone?”
Instead:
“How do we create enough safety that separation no longer feels dangerous?”
Not:
“How do we make her engage in play therapy?”
Instead:
“How do we help her nervous system feel safe enough to explore?”
This is advanced clinical thinking.
One major takeaway from this episode is the importance of not skipping the intake and psychosocial history process.
Cathi strongly emphasizes:
You cannot conceptualize what you do not fully understand.
Missing information can include:
Without this context, therapists may misread trauma adaptations as behavioral problems.
This episode is a powerful reminder that play therapists do not need more random activities.
They need deeper understanding.
Because when you know what is at the root:
Case conceptualization is not extra.
It is foundational.
Cathi’s upcoming training explores:
Register for the training here.
For therapists seeking ongoing support, case staffing, book club, and community. Enroll here.
For therapists ready to develop deeper competency, confidence, and advanced play therapy skill mastery. Schedule a free 30 minute call here.
Categories: : Case Conceptualization, emotion regulation, Play Therapy, Play Therapy Academy, Play Therapy Elevation Circle, Podcast, Trauma