Why trauma play therapy often stalls without caregiver involvement—and how I use a neuroscience and attachment lens to guide treatment planning
When I work with traumatized children and teens, one of the questions that comes up over and over again in consultation, trainings, and supervision is this:
“How do I include parents or caregivers in the play therapy process?”
And if the child is in foster care, the question becomes even more complicated.
In this week’s episode of Next Level Play Therapy, I continued our discussion from last week’s case conceptualization episode by walking through the next critical step:
How I use case conceptualization to guide treatment planning and caregiver involvement.
Because in my experience, even strong play therapy work can stall if caregivers are not intentionally integrated into the healing process.
One of the biggest mistakes I see play therapists make is either:
When I’m working with traumatized children, I don’t view healing as something that happens only inside the playroom.
Children heal in relationship.
And when trauma happens within relationships—or disrupts attachment relationships—then the therapeutic process eventually has to address those attachment systems.
In this episode, I continued using the fictional case study of Carla, a seven-year-old girl placed in foster care after experiencing chronic neglect, homelessness, and parental substance abuse. (If you want to read the previous blog, click here).
Carla presents with:
Her play therapist, Sarah, feels stuck because Carla is not engaging much in the playroom.
And honestly? Most play therapists have experienced this at some point.
We start wondering:
But when we shift from focusing on the behavior to understanding trauma and attachment, the treatment process starts to make much more sense.
I say this all the time:
You cannot figure out what to do until you understand what is happening underneath the behavior.
Instead of viewing Carla’s behaviors as manipulation, defiance, or “attention-seeking,” I conceptualize them as adaptive survival responses.
For example:
This is not simply “bad behavior.”
This may be a nervous system adapting to chronic unpredictability and food insecurity.
This is not dependency.
This is an attachment system desperately searching for safety.
This is not resistance.
This is self-protection.
Once we understand the behavior through a neuroscience and attachment lens, treatment planning changes dramatically.
If Carla’s nervous system is organized around survival and threat detection, then healing requires more than individual play therapy sessions.
It requires:
That means caregivers become an essential part of the treatment process.
As I shared in the episode:
“Carla needs to re-experience caregiver relationship as safe and reliable.”
Traumatized children often cannot regulate independently yet.
Their nervous systems need regulated adults to help them feel safe enough to heal.
When therapists work with children in foster care, one of the biggest mistakes I see is a lack of collaboration with foster care workers.
Before I can effectively integrate caregivers into treatment, I need to understand:
Without this information, treatment planning becomes incomplete.
Another thing I’ve learned over the years is this:
Behavioral strategies alone often do not work well with traumatized children.
Caregivers frequently need support learning:
And we also have to remember:
Many caregivers have trauma histories themselves.
That means the child’s dysregulation can activate the adult’s nervous system too.
This is why dedicated caregiver sessions matter so much.
When I’m creating a treatment plan, I always start with the play therapy model.
Your theoretical framework matters.
For example:
May involve parent consultation sessions outside the playroom
May involve direct caregiver participation inside sessions
May combine attachment work, expressive arts, family sessions, and trauma-informed interventions
The key is intentionality.
I don’t want caregivers loosely “included.”
I want their involvement to align with the therapeutic goals and the theoretical framework guiding treatment.
For Carla’s treatment plan, I would likely include:
To support safety, expression, and regulation
To teach attachment-based parenting strategies
To facilitate attachment repair and co-regulation
To ensure treatment aligns with reunification planning
To determine which adults need to remain involved in the healing process
This creates a coordinated, trauma-informed approach rather than simply trying to “manage behavior.”
One thing I strongly believe is that caregiver work cannot happen randomly or only during crises.
There needs to be:
Without preparation, family sessions can quickly become dysregulating rather than healing.
One of the biggest themes throughout this episode is this:
Trauma disrupts attachment and felt safety.
So healing often requires restoring relational safety.
This is why integrating caregivers is not just an “extra” part of trauma treatment.
In many cases, it is one of the most important parts.
When therapists feel pressure to stop behaviors quickly, it becomes easy to focus only on symptom reduction.
But when trauma and attachment disruption are underneath the behavior, symptom-focused interventions alone often fall short.
Instead, I encourage play therapists to ask:
That shift changes everything.
In this upcoming training, I’ll walk you through:
You can register for this training by clicking here.
When you register for the training, you’ll also receive 60 days of access to Play Therapy Elevation Circle.
Play Therapy Elevation Circle is my ongoing consultation and support community for play therapists who want:
Because play therapists should not have to do this work alone.
Categories: : Case Conceptualization, emotion regulation, Play Therapy, Play Therapy Academy, Play Therapy Elevation Circle, Podcast, Trauma